
I've been listening to the news today and it is full of various religious leaders making their Easter statements. Most of these are very encouraging 'Peace' here and 'Faith' there, all jolly nice and then my favourite, I just love Anglican clergy, from the Arch Bishop of Canterbury. In it he attacked various people who undermine the story of Christ - I know you are wondering where this is going - including Dan Brown's fictional work. He commented on the preponderance of conspiracy theorists and the mythology that surrounds the gospels. At the heart of his message is a question, the same one that Pilate asked Jesus - assuming... Well you get the point.
The question -----What is Truth?
So what is truth? Well in the words of Chris Carter we know that The Truth is Out There and given the world of Mulder and Sculley conspiracies abound. Who married who? Was Christ married?
Ok confession time -
I have read most (not all) of the DaVinci Code and as a piece literature, well it's not! I'm not being a book snob it is just pish, badly written and shows a lack of linguistic skill - and if anyone guns their car again... It is pish, bad story, in poor English but despite all of this it is the way Brown behaves that really annoys me. The book is fiction but he acts like it is real. It is a conspiracy theory beyond belief. He drops in little things to make it more 'believable' and then when asked if it is the truth raises his eyes (metaphorically) as if to say 'yes but I don't want to say'. This is what pissed off Dr Williams and he was right to be pissed.
So What is Truth? Growing up we use to debate whether there was absolute truth or if it was relative. I am not such a firm believer in absolutes anymore but I am convinced that the early church was not so institutionalised that it had an agenda when setting the canon. It was about a search for the truth. They wanted the documents of those who they were sure had known Jesus personally or who had recorded the stories of those who had first hand knowledge.
Tumchie Muncher and I had a discussion a few years about the willingness of people to see the worst in people rather that the best. This applies to religion, politics, education, media almost all spheres of life. But perhaps that is the wonder of the Easter Message, not a retelling of the worst news or belief but a celebration of the best news. If you don't believe the Easter story in its literal sense you can still take some joy in the knowledge that some people are still willing to look at the darkest dawn and see the good.
-
PS. Oh by the way I find it hard to believe that a church that painted out 'Christ's wife' in favour of Peter would have him so violently denying Christ three times and the countless mentions of him that are so negative.
